DEALS
-
-
Year
-
-
- Practices
-
Chinese Mainland Capital MarketsHong Kong & Overseas Capital MarketsInvestment/M&A & Corporate GovernanceCross-border Investment/M&AConstruction & Project DevelopmentFinancingDebt Restructuring & Non-performing AssetsTaxation & Wealth PlanningPrivate Equity & Investment FundsFinancial Products & TrustsLitigation & ArbitrationCorporate & Commercial CrimeBankruptcy, Insolvency & ReorganizationShippingCompliance & InvestigationAntitrust & CompetitionTrade Compliance & Trade RemediesCustoms & Import/ExportLabor & EmploymentHealth, Safety & Environmental ProtectionIP Licensing & EnforcementTrademark ProsecutionPatent ProsecutionCybersecurity & Data Protection
-
- Industries
-
Real EstateUrban InfrastructureTransportation & LogisticsTourism & HospitalityEnergy & PowerMining & Natural ResourcesBanking & Financial ServicesInsuranceFinancial Innovation & FintechTelecommunications & InternetInformation & Intelligence TechnologyHealthcarePharmaceuticals & Life SciencesEducation & TrainingMedia-Sports & EntertainmentNational Defense & Military IndustryRetail & Consumer ProductsIndustry & ManufacturingAgriculture & Food
-
- Latest
- Most relevant
-
-
-
Zhong Lun Advised on China Agri’s Acquisition of five Cereals and Oil Companies
Acting as the PRC legal counsel for China Agri in the Transactions, Zhong Lun Law Firm (“Zhong Lun”) has provided legal service to the client throughout the Transactions.
2019-02-14
-
- 2019-01-29
-
Zhong Lun Represented ARCH Capital in its Acquisition of a Real Estate Project
Zhong Lun Law Firm represented ARCH Capital in this transaction.
-
- 2019-01-22
-
Zhong Lun Advised on SoftBank’s Investment in WeWork
Zhong Lun Law Firm acted as the PRC legal counsel to SoftBank in this transaction.
-
- 2019-01-17
-
Zhong Lun Advises on TR INTERIORS's IPO in Hong Kong
Zhong Lun Law Firm had provided legal services in this offering.
-
- 2018-12-28
-
Zhong Lun Law Firm Represented VINCE, LLC in the Trademark Infringement Lawsuit against A Famous Sportswear Company and Won Case in First Instance Court - 5.95 Million Compensation Fully Supported
This case is typical of the court's application of discretionary damage compensation to determine the amount of compensation above the statutory maximum, when it is difficult to prove specific amount of the defendant's benefits acquired by the infringement, but it can be proved that such amount obviously exceeds the statutory maximum limit of compensation.